|
All
the training events are designed
to help the participants achieve a specific level of knowledge that will result
in improved personal and business performance. We believe that for the training
investment to deliver value through sustainable change there must be a clear line of
sight, across three primary areas:

-
The learning that will take place at the event and the resulting knowledge.
-
What performance capability the new knowledge will deliver.
-
What business value will be generated by this enhanced performance.
The
key thing is to ensure than the knowledge is fit for purpose and not over or
under engineered. It is important for sponsors
and delegates to ensure that they attend an event that will help deliver the new
performance and value. Clearly it can be depressing for a delegate to attend a course that offers them nothing to take away and use in the
workplace. Conversely, it is a waste of the delegates and sponsors time if the delegate
becomes over educated - learning a host of new thoughts, feelings and behaviors that
has little or no relevance at all to their role.

The
net result is that it is possible to create a taxonomy or hierarchy that shows
the translation of knowledge into business performance. At the lowest level of knowledge
acquisition is someone who reads a book, visits a seminar or uses a web site.
They may have discovered some new knowledge and can describe this to others. The
value is that they now have a language by which they can have productive conversations
through the use of a shared language and mental map. At the next level is
someone who can use their knowledge to apply or actively use their knowledge at
an operational level. This step process
continues up to the highest level where someone is seen as an authority or
expert in the field. This incremental process can be seen in the following
table:
|
Knowledge
Level |
Performance
Level |
Business Value
|
|
At the end of the event
I want someone who might be viewed as: |
..... and
they are able to:
|
...... that
will create value by:
|
|
5
- An Authority |
....
judge
other people's work from a position of authority and against accepted criteria.. |
....
setting new business performance standards against wider markets and
business trends. |
|
4
- An Architect |
....
originate,
integrate and combine ideas into a new product, plan or proposal. |
... improving
business benchmarks and performance. |
|
3
- Able to Analyze |
....
compare,
contrast and classify information in order to form a performance judgment. |
.... ensure
and assure that performance standards are being maintained. |
|
2
- Able to Apply |
....
use
the knowledge to resolve operational problems . |
.... delivering
improved performance |
|
1
- Aware |
.....
explain
what they know and how it might be used. . |
..
facilitating productive conversations within the company and with customers. |
The following
hierarchy sets out in the more detail the five learning levels. If you are not sure what level of knowledge is required then
please contact us and we can work through the levels to help define which is
most appropriate and will realize a return on your investment.
| Level |
Title |
Description
|
Learning
processes |
| 1 |
AWARENESS |
The
ability to grasp and remember the meaning of the ideas. This may involve
the recall of a wide range of material, from specific facts to complete
theories, but all that is required is the bringing to mind of the
appropriate information.
Examples of learning objectives at this
level are: know common terms, know specific facts, know methods and
procedures, know basic concepts, know principles.
This level of knowledge
might be used for people who need to know the ideas sufficiently to have a
basic conversation with others, but not to the extent where they would
need to use the knowledge when under critical moments of pressure or
stress.
|
|
| 2 |
APPLICATION |
This
refers to the ability to use information, methods, concepts, theories in
new situations and to solve problems. This may include the application of
such things as rules, methods, concepts, principles, laws, and theories.
Can take knowledge and apply in a different context. Can infer causes
associated with knowledge and predict consequences of action.
This would be the more
common learning level for people who need to make use of the knowledge in
the market.
They would be expected to apply the knowledge to create value and deliver
a demonstrable return on the training investment..
|
-
Workshop
-
Coaching
-
Peer
assessment
-
Post event
web-support
-
Post event
peer workshop
-
Applied
accreditation
|
| 3 |
ANALYST |
Able
to break ideas down into their component parts so that the
organizational and underpinning structure may be understood. Able to see
patterns and components in the blueprint. Also able to recognize hidden
meaning within the knowledge. This may include the identification of
parts, analysis of the relationship between parts, and recognition of the
organizational principles involved.
Action using this knowledge represents a
higher intellectual level than application because it requires an
understanding of both the content and the structural form of the material. This
might be the learning level achieved by someone who wised to supervise
people others as an expert . They might need to critically
appraise and test others to assure that performance meets a required standard
and diagnose what action must be taken where performance deviates from the
expected level.
|
|
| 4 |
ARCHITECT |
This
refers to the ability to put parts together to form a new whole. Actions
in this area stress creative behaviors, with major emphasis on the
formulation of new patterns or structure.
This includes the use of old ideas to
create new ones, generalize from given facts and relate knowledge from
several areas. The
learning level would be required where the participants will be expected
to originate knowledge for use in the business. For example
to integrate external ideas and models with existing internal business templates
and standards.
|
-
Composition of papers that explore new
frames and ideas.
-
Academic
study
-
Research
programs
-
Longitudinal
studies
-
Cross
boundary integration
-
Cross
cultural experiences
-
Peer
presentations
|
| 5 |
AUTHORITY |
Able
to sit as final authorization and in judgment of the knowledge based on
personal values/opinions. Can discriminate between ideas, assess their
value and make choices based on reasoned argument. The judgments are to be
based on definite criteria. These may be internal criteria (organization)
or external criteria (relevance to the purpose).
Learning in this area sits in the highest knowledge
level because they contain elements of all the other categories, plus
conscious value judgments based on clearly defined criteria. This
learning level might be quite rare in a business. However it would be necessary
where the individual or organization needs complete independence from external
sources of knowledge and wish to be able to originate and sign off proprietary
knowledge
for use within the business.
. |
-
Mentoring
-
Training and assessing
others
-
Authoring of
critical papers.
-
Academic
verification
-
Peer
verification
-
National and International
Publication
-
Citation
from other authorities and authors.
-
Public
scrutiny
|
Return to home page
(c)
Mick Cope
|